When pursuing International Food Standard certification, understanding the service protocol is essential for food manufacturing companies seeking to demonstrate their commitment to quality and safety. The IFS Issue 5 Service Protocol establishes a systematic framework that guides organizations through the certification journey, from selecting the right certification body to managing potential appeals. This protocol ensures consistency, transparency, and accountability throughout the audit process.

Table of Contents

Selecting a certification body

The first step in the IFS certification journey involves choosing an accredited certification body that has a valid contract with IFS Management GmbH and is accredited to ISO/IEC 17065:2012. Organizations can search for approved certification bodies directly through the IFS database, where over 83 certification bodies operate globally with approximately 1,450 qualified auditors.

Before the audit begins, companies must establish a formal contract with their chosen certification body. This contract should clearly define the audit scope, including all products, processes, and locations to be assessed. The company must provide detailed information about their operations, including product types, processing methods, exported products with destination countries, and any history of previous certifications. This upfront transparency allows the certification body to assign auditors with appropriate product and technology scope qualifications.

Understanding audit notification and preparation

The notification process differs significantly depending on whether the audit will be announced or unannounced. For announced audits, the audit date is scheduled at least eight weeks before the audit due date and no later than two weeks after. The certification body must register the first audit day in the IFS Database at least 14 calendar days before the audit begins.

For unannounced audits, which must occur at least once every third audit cycle, companies receive notification about the audit time window rather than a specific date. This window extends from 16 weeks before the audit due date to two weeks after. Companies can specify a blackout period of up to 10 working days when they’re unavailable, though this must be communicated at least four weeks before the time window begins.

Preparation is crucial for audit success. Companies should conduct internal audits, ensure all documentation is current and accessible, verify that HACCP plans are comprehensive, and prepare staff for potential interviews. The audit duration, calculated using the mandatory IFS Calculation Tool, considers factors like total employee count, number of product scopes, and processing steps involved.

The audit scope and flow

The audit scope must encompass all activities at the site, including all production lines and products manufactured. Certification is always site-specific, meaning one legal entity at one address receives one certificate. The scope description must be clear and detailed, specifying product types, packaging materials used, and characteristic processes that differentiate products from others.

The IFS Food audit follows a structured product and process approach. This includes product sampling at the beginning of the audit, an overall on-site evaluation where at least 50% of audit time is spent in production areas, and comprehensive documentation review. The auditor examines critical control points, observes employee practices, inspects hygiene conditions, and verifies that food safety management systems function effectively in practice.

Compliance levels and scoring system

The IFS scoring system evaluates each requirement on a scale that reflects the level of implementation. Full compliance (A rating) earns 20 points, while almost full compliance with small deviations (B rating) earns 15 points. Partial implementation (C rating) receives only 5 points, and complete non-implementation (D rating) results in negative 20 points.

Among the standard requirements, ten are designated as Knockout (KO) requirements. These address fundamental food safety topics including governance and commitment, monitoring systems for critical control points, personal hygiene, customer agreements, raw material specifications, foreign material risk mitigation, traceability, internal audits, recall procedures, and corrective actions. KO requirements can only receive A, B, C, or D scores, and a D rating on any KO requirement results in automatic audit failure regardless of the overall score.

Major non-conformities represent substantial failures that could impact food safety or legal compliance. A Major non-conformity subtracts 15% from the possible total score, while a KO non-conformity scored with D subtracts 50%. When one Major non-conformity occurs with a total score above 75%, companies can schedule a follow-up audit. However, multiple Major non-conformities or scores below 75% require a complete new initial audit.

Audit report issuance and certification decisions

Following the audit, the certification body issues a preliminary action plan within two weeks. Companies must then submit completed corrective actions with evidence of implementation within four weeks. The final audit report and certificate should be uploaded to the IFS Database between six and eight weeks from the last audit day.

Certification at Higher Level requires a score of 95% or above with no Major or KO non-conformities. Foundation Level certification requires scores between 75% and 95%, also with no Major or KO non-conformities. The certificate remains valid for 12 months, with recertification audits scheduled annually to maintain continuous compliance.

Audit frequency and certification cycle

IFS maintains an annual certification cycle, requiring companies to undergo a full audit every year. The recertification audit must occur within a specific time window calculated from the initial audit date. For announced audits, this window extends from eight weeks before to two weeks after the audit due date. Missing this window causes a break in certification, requiring a new initial audit to restart the certification process.

Companies that successfully complete unannounced audits receive IFS Star Status, visible on their certificate and in the database. This status demonstrates their commitment to maintaining consistent standards without advance preparation time.

The appeal process

When companies disagree with audit findings or certification decisions, they have the right to file an appeal. The appeal process, managed by the certification body, must be handled by personnel who were not involved in the original audit or certification decision. Appeals should be submitted in writing, clearly stating the grounds for disagreement and providing supporting documentation.

Certification bodies typically acknowledge appeals within five working days and aim to resolve them within a defined timeframe, often 60 to 90 days. If the company remains unsatisfied with the certification body’s response, they may escalate the matter to the accreditation body. The entire process maintains strict confidentiality and ensures no discriminatory actions against appellants.

Additionally, the IFS Integrity Program accepts complaints from any interested parties, including retailers and whistle-blowers. Complaints submitted through the IFS complaint management system undergo neutral evaluation by IFS staff, who may initiate integrity on-site checks or witness audits to investigate concerns thoroughly.

What do you think? How might your organization benefit from implementing a structured approach to IFS certification preparation? What steps could you take today to ensure your facility maintains the consistent standards required for unannounced audits?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en/certification-bodies
  2. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en/?view=article&id=113:certificatin-bodies
  3. https://goaudits.com/blog/ifs-audits/
  4. https://www.ifs-certification.com/images/ifs_documents/IFS_Food_v8_standard_EN.pdf
  5. https://www.foodsafety-experts.com/knock-out-ko-criteria-ifs-food-version-8/
  6. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Food Safety and Quality Management Systems

1 Introduction to Management systems

  1. Introduction to ISO 9001
  2. ISO 9000
  3. Introduction to ISO 14001:2004
  4. How to Use ISO 14001
  5. Introduction to OHSAS 18001:2007
  6. How to Use OHSAS 18001:2007
  7. Introduction to ISO/IEC 27001
  8. The PDCA Model

2 Auditing

  1. Clause 1 – Scope of the Standard
  2. Clause 2 – Normative References
  3. Clause 3 – Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4 – Principles of Auditing
  5. Clause 5 – Managing an Audit Program
  6. Clause 6 – Audit Activities
  7. Clause 7 – Competence and Evaluation of Auditors

3 Standardization and Accreditation

  1. International Accreditation Forum (IAF)
  2. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)
  3. Quality Council of India (QCI)
  4. National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL)
  5. ISO/TS 22003:2007 Food Safety Management System
  6. ISO Guide 65: General Requirements for Bodies Operating Product Certification Systems
  7. ISO/IEC 17020:1998 General Criteria for the Operation of Various Types of Bodies Performing Inspections
  8. ISO/IEC 17021:2006 – Conformity Assessment-Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems
  9. ISO 17025:2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

4 ISO 9001-2000 – An Overview

  1. ISO 9000
  2. Quality Management Principles
  3. ISO 9000:2005, Quality Management Systems: Fundamentals and Vocabulary
  4. ISO 9001:2000, Quality Management Systems: Requirements
  5. Steps for Implementing Quality Management Systems
  6. Benefits of ISO 9001:2000
  7. ISO 9004:2000, Quality Management Systems: Guidelines for Performance Improvements
  8. Relationship with ISO 9001:2000
  9. Self-assessment Model

5 ISO 9001-2000 – Structure

  1. Documentation Structure of ISO 9001:2000
  2. Quality Manual
  3. Mandatory Procedures
  4. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
  5. Process Definition Documents
  6. Work Instructions
  7. Miscellaneous Documents
  8. Formats and Records
  9. ISO 9001:2000 Clauses

6 Clause wise interpretation of ISO 9001-2000

  1. Clause 1: Scope
  2. Clause 2: Normative Reference
  3. Clause 3: Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4: Quality Management System
  5. Clause 5: Management Responsibility
  6. Clause 6: Resource Management
  7. Clause 7: Product Realization
  8. Clause 8: Measurement, Analysis and Improvement

7 ISO 9001-2000 – Case Studies

  1. Engineering Job Work Organisation
  2. Software Development Organisation
  3. Management Review in Engineering
  4. Customer-Related Processes in Software
  5. Internal Audits in Engineering
  6. Design and Development in Software
  7. Corrective and Preventive Actions in Software
  8. Customer Property Management in Engineering

8 ISO 22000-2005 – An Overview

  1. What Does ISO 22000 Bring to the HACCP Method?
  2. System Components
  3. Communication between Participants in the Food Industry
  4. ISO 22000: A Passport for Exporting?
  5. Why do Companies Commit themselves to an ISO 22000 Approach?
  6. Who Should Use ISO 22000:2005?
  7. Why Use ISO 22000:2005?
  8. ISO 22000 and HACCP
  9. Codex Alimentarius
  10. Key Elements and Benefits of ISO 22000

9 ISO 22000-2005 – Structure

  1. Economic Loss due to Food Borne Illness
  2. ISO 22000: 2005 Clauses
  3. FSMS Documentation Structure
  4. Food Safety Team Structure
  5. Food Safety Manual
  6. Mandatory Procedures
  7. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)/Work Instructions
  8. HACCP Pre-steps Related Documents
  9. HACCP Principles Related Documents
  10. Miscellaneous Documents
  11. Formats and Records

10 Clause-wise interpretation of ISO 22000- 2005

  1. Clause 1: Scope
  2. Clause 2: Normative References
  3. Clause 3: Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4: Food Safety Management System
  5. Clause 5: Management Responsibility
  6. Clause 6: Resource Management
  7. Clause 7: Planning and Realization of Safe Products
  8. Clause 8: Validation, Verification and Improvement of the FSMS

11 ISO 22000-2005-Case Studies

  1. Kick-off meeting
  2. Introduction to the standard
  3. Formation of food safety team
  4. Description of product and its intended use
  5. PRP (Pre-requisite programme)
  6. Flow diagrams, process steps and control measures
  7. Control measure assessment
  8. Verification of food safety management system
  9. Traceability system
  10. External communication
  11. Internal communication
  12. Management Reviews

12 An Overview and Requirements of ISO 17025

  1. Introduction to the ISO/IEC 17025 Standard
  2. Scope of ISO/IEC 17025
  3. Normative References
  4. Terms and Definitions
  5. General Requirements
  6. Structural Requirements
  7. Resource Requirements
  8. Process Requirements
  9. Management System Requirements

13 Requirements specific to Food testing laboratories – Physical and chemical Parameters

  1. Introduction
  2. Quality and Safety Requirements of Food Products
  3. Chemical and Physical Testing Requirements of Food Products
  4. Laboratory Quality Management System
  5. Management Requirements (Clause 4 of ISO 17025)
  6. Technical Requirements (Clause 5 of ISO 17025)
  7. Traceability of Measurement
  8. Sampling
  9. Handling Test and Calibration Items
  10. Assuring the Quality of Test and Calibration Results

14 Requirements specific to Food testing laboratories – Biological parameters

  1. Introduction
  2. Quality and Safety Requirements of Food Products
  3. Biological Testing Requirements of Food Products

15 General topics- related to Food testing laboratories

  1. Method Validation
  2. Ruggedness
  3. Uncertainty of Measurement
  4. International Accreditation Aspects

16 BRC Food and BRC/IOP Standards – An Overview

  1. BRC Global Standard – Food (Issue 5, January 2005)
  2. Introduction to BRC Food Standard
  3. Legislative Requirements
  4. Benefits of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  5. Principles of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  6. The Standard Technical Advisory Committee
  7. Scope of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  8. The Format of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  9. Application
  10. Structure and Interpretation of the Standard
  11. BRC / IOP Global Standard Issue 3 2001 (Food Packaging and Other Packaging Materials)
  12. IOP: The Institute of Packaging
  13. BRC/IOP Relationship
  14. Benefits of BRC/IOP Packaging Standard
  15. Principles of BRC/IOP Packaging Standard
  16. Application
  17. Structure of BRC / IOP Global Standard – Food Packaging and Other Packaging Materials

17 International Food Standard

  1. Background of the IFS
  2. Service Protocol of the IFS ISSUE 5
  3. Contractual Arrangements – Selection of Certifying Body
  4. Audit Notification
  5. Scope of the Audit
  6. Audit Flow – Preparing the Audit Plan
  7. Level Determination – KO, Major NC’s, NA
  8. Scores, Issuing the Audit Report and Certification
  9. Audit Frequency
  10. Audit Report
  11. Awarding of Certificate
  12. Distribution of the Audit Report
  13. Supplementary Action
  14. Appeal Procedure
  15. Complaints
  16. IFS – Catalogue of Requirements
  17. Management of Quality System
  18. Management Responsibility
  19. Resource Management
  20. Product Realization
  21. Measurements, Analysis and Improvements
  22. Requirements for Certification Bodies and Auditors
  23. Report

18 SQF 1000 And SQF 2000

  1. SQF 1000
  2. Interpretation of SQF 1000 Standard
  3. SQF 2000
  4. Interpretation of SQF 2000 Standard
  5. Let Us Sum Up

19 Global GAP and India GAP

  1. Potential Benefits and Challenges Related to Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)
  2. Description of the FAO/GAPs
  3. USDA GAP/GHP Programme
  4. Global GAP
  5. India GAP