When pursuing IFS certification for your food business, one of your most critical decisions is selecting the right certifying body to conduct your audit. This choice directly impacts not only the audit experience but also the credibility and global acceptance of your certification. Understanding what to look for in a certifying body helps ensure you’re making an informed decision that supports your business goals.

Table of Contents

Why accreditation matters for IFS certifying bodies

Not all certifying bodies are authorized to conduct IFS audits. To become an IFS partner, certification bodies must hold accreditation according to ISO/IEC 17065, the international standard that specifies requirements for bodies certifying products, processes, and services. This standard replaced the earlier EN 45011 designation and ensures certification bodies operate with competence, consistency, and impartiality.

ISO/IEC 17065 establishes requirements intended to facilitate the recognition of certification bodies and the acceptance of certified products, processes, and services on both national and international levels. When a certifying body holds this accreditation, it demonstrates they have been independently assessed and verified to meet rigorous operational standards. This includes maintaining proper quality management systems, ensuring auditor competence, and operating without conflicts of interest.

For your business, working with an accredited certifying body means your IFS certificate will carry weight in the marketplace. IFS cooperates with national accreditation bodies like DAkkS in Germany and is recognized by the European Accreditation (EA) and International Accreditation Forum (IAF), creating a global framework of trust and acceptance.

Auditor language proficiency requirements

Language barriers during an audit can lead to misunderstandings, incomplete assessments, and unnecessary complications. That’s why IFS standards place significant emphasis on language compatibility between auditors and the companies they assess.

IFS requires that auditors performing audits have relevant education, audit experience, hygiene training, language competence, and specific practical knowledge within defined product scopes. The language requirement isn’t just about basic communication-auditors need to understand technical terminology, production processes, and documentation in the language used at your facility.

The audit should preferably be carried out in the language of the company, and the certification body should make every attempt to appoint an auditor whose native language or main working language matches the company’s language. This ensures accurate assessment of your food safety systems, proper understanding of your documentation, and meaningful conversations with your staff during interviews.

What if no auditor speaks your language?

In cases where a certifying body cannot provide an auditor proficient in your company’s language, interpreters may be used under specific conditions. The interpreter must have a technical background or be an approved auditor for another food safety standard, and must remain independent from your company to avoid conflicts of interest. When interpreters are used, expect the audit duration to increase by approximately 20% to ensure thorough assessment.

The importance of a detailed contract

Before any audit takes place, you must establish a formal contract with your chosen certifying body. This isn’t just a formality-it’s a critical document that protects both parties and sets clear expectations for the certification process.

A contract must exist between the company and the certification body detailing the scope of the audit, the duration, and reporting requirements. The scope section should clearly define which products, processes, or services will be audited, leaving no room for ambiguity about what’s included or excluded from the assessment.

Essential contract elements

Your contract should specify the minimum audit duration based on factors like your facility size, product complexity, number of employees, and the scope of products being certified. The certifying body uses established methodologies to calculate appropriate audit time, ensuring sufficient coverage of all relevant requirements.

The contract must also reference the IFS Integrity Program, which allows quality assurance personnel from IFS offices to conduct on-site checks at certified companies. This program helps maintain the credibility of the entire IFS certification system by monitoring audit quality and auditor performance.

Reporting requirements outlined in the contract establish how findings will be documented, what format the audit report will take, when you’ll receive results, and the process for addressing any non-conformities discovered during the audit. Clear reporting expectations help you prepare for what comes after the audit and understand your responsibilities in the corrective action process.

Evaluating a certifying body’s technical competence

Beyond basic accreditation requirements, you should evaluate whether a certifying body has auditors qualified for your specific product categories and technology scopes. IFS certification covers diverse sectors from food processing to packaging materials, each requiring specialized knowledge.

Ask potential certifying bodies about their auditor pool. Do they have auditors experienced in your specific product categories? Can they demonstrate knowledge of the technologies and processes relevant to your operations? Certification bodies can have auditors qualified for one or several scopes and standards, so confirming alignment with your needs is essential.

Questions to ask before making your choice

When evaluating certifying bodies, ask about their experience with companies similar to yours in size, product type, and complexity. Request information about their auditor training programs and how they ensure auditor competence remains current with evolving IFS requirements.

Inquire about their audit scheduling flexibility and responsiveness to questions during the certification process. Find out how they handle situations where non-conformities are identified, and what support they provide to help you address issues. Understanding their customer service approach helps set realistic expectations for the working relationship.

Don’t hesitate to ask for references from other companies they’ve certified, particularly those in your industry sector. Speaking with peers who’ve worked with the certifying body provides valuable insights into their professionalism, thoroughness, and overall effectiveness.

Making your final decision

Selecting a certifying body for your IFS audit requires balancing several factors: proper accreditation credentials, auditor language capabilities, transparent contracting practices, technical expertise in your product categories, and a track record of professional service. While cost certainly matters, it shouldn’t be your sole deciding factor. The right certifying body becomes a partner in your food safety journey, not just an assessor checking boxes on an audit form.

Take time to research your options, ask detailed questions, and choose a certifying body that demonstrates genuine understanding of your business needs. Your investment in this decision pays dividends through smoother audits, more valuable feedback, and a certification that truly reflects your commitment to food safety excellence.

What do you think? Have you considered how language compatibility with your auditor might affect your audit experience? What aspects of the contract with your certifying body do you consider most important to protect your interests?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en/partner-network/certification-bodies
  2. https://anab.ansi.org/standard/iso-iec-17065/
  3. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en/ifs-portfolio/accreditation
  4. https://www.ifs-certification.com/en/auditors
  5. https://ifs-standard.com/index.php/en/industry-en/ifs-certification-process-en/2688-ifs-certification-process-en

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Food Safety and Quality Management Systems

1 Introduction to Management systems

  1. Introduction to ISO 9001
  2. ISO 9000
  3. Introduction to ISO 14001:2004
  4. How to Use ISO 14001
  5. Introduction to OHSAS 18001:2007
  6. How to Use OHSAS 18001:2007
  7. Introduction to ISO/IEC 27001
  8. The PDCA Model

2 Auditing

  1. Clause 1 – Scope of the Standard
  2. Clause 2 – Normative References
  3. Clause 3 – Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4 – Principles of Auditing
  5. Clause 5 – Managing an Audit Program
  6. Clause 6 – Audit Activities
  7. Clause 7 – Competence and Evaluation of Auditors

3 Standardization and Accreditation

  1. International Accreditation Forum (IAF)
  2. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)
  3. Quality Council of India (QCI)
  4. National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL)
  5. ISO/TS 22003:2007 Food Safety Management System
  6. ISO Guide 65: General Requirements for Bodies Operating Product Certification Systems
  7. ISO/IEC 17020:1998 General Criteria for the Operation of Various Types of Bodies Performing Inspections
  8. ISO/IEC 17021:2006 – Conformity Assessment-Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems
  9. ISO 17025:2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

4 ISO 9001-2000 – An Overview

  1. ISO 9000
  2. Quality Management Principles
  3. ISO 9000:2005, Quality Management Systems: Fundamentals and Vocabulary
  4. ISO 9001:2000, Quality Management Systems: Requirements
  5. Steps for Implementing Quality Management Systems
  6. Benefits of ISO 9001:2000
  7. ISO 9004:2000, Quality Management Systems: Guidelines for Performance Improvements
  8. Relationship with ISO 9001:2000
  9. Self-assessment Model

5 ISO 9001-2000 – Structure

  1. Documentation Structure of ISO 9001:2000
  2. Quality Manual
  3. Mandatory Procedures
  4. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
  5. Process Definition Documents
  6. Work Instructions
  7. Miscellaneous Documents
  8. Formats and Records
  9. ISO 9001:2000 Clauses

6 Clause wise interpretation of ISO 9001-2000

  1. Clause 1: Scope
  2. Clause 2: Normative Reference
  3. Clause 3: Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4: Quality Management System
  5. Clause 5: Management Responsibility
  6. Clause 6: Resource Management
  7. Clause 7: Product Realization
  8. Clause 8: Measurement, Analysis and Improvement

7 ISO 9001-2000 – Case Studies

  1. Engineering Job Work Organisation
  2. Software Development Organisation
  3. Management Review in Engineering
  4. Customer-Related Processes in Software
  5. Internal Audits in Engineering
  6. Design and Development in Software
  7. Corrective and Preventive Actions in Software
  8. Customer Property Management in Engineering

8 ISO 22000-2005 – An Overview

  1. What Does ISO 22000 Bring to the HACCP Method?
  2. System Components
  3. Communication between Participants in the Food Industry
  4. ISO 22000: A Passport for Exporting?
  5. Why do Companies Commit themselves to an ISO 22000 Approach?
  6. Who Should Use ISO 22000:2005?
  7. Why Use ISO 22000:2005?
  8. ISO 22000 and HACCP
  9. Codex Alimentarius
  10. Key Elements and Benefits of ISO 22000

9 ISO 22000-2005 – Structure

  1. Economic Loss due to Food Borne Illness
  2. ISO 22000: 2005 Clauses
  3. FSMS Documentation Structure
  4. Food Safety Team Structure
  5. Food Safety Manual
  6. Mandatory Procedures
  7. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)/Work Instructions
  8. HACCP Pre-steps Related Documents
  9. HACCP Principles Related Documents
  10. Miscellaneous Documents
  11. Formats and Records

10 Clause-wise interpretation of ISO 22000- 2005

  1. Clause 1: Scope
  2. Clause 2: Normative References
  3. Clause 3: Terms and Definitions
  4. Clause 4: Food Safety Management System
  5. Clause 5: Management Responsibility
  6. Clause 6: Resource Management
  7. Clause 7: Planning and Realization of Safe Products
  8. Clause 8: Validation, Verification and Improvement of the FSMS

11 ISO 22000-2005-Case Studies

  1. Kick-off meeting
  2. Introduction to the standard
  3. Formation of food safety team
  4. Description of product and its intended use
  5. PRP (Pre-requisite programme)
  6. Flow diagrams, process steps and control measures
  7. Control measure assessment
  8. Verification of food safety management system
  9. Traceability system
  10. External communication
  11. Internal communication
  12. Management Reviews

12 An Overview and Requirements of ISO 17025

  1. Introduction to the ISO/IEC 17025 Standard
  2. Scope of ISO/IEC 17025
  3. Normative References
  4. Terms and Definitions
  5. General Requirements
  6. Structural Requirements
  7. Resource Requirements
  8. Process Requirements
  9. Management System Requirements

13 Requirements specific to Food testing laboratories – Physical and chemical Parameters

  1. Introduction
  2. Quality and Safety Requirements of Food Products
  3. Chemical and Physical Testing Requirements of Food Products
  4. Laboratory Quality Management System
  5. Management Requirements (Clause 4 of ISO 17025)
  6. Technical Requirements (Clause 5 of ISO 17025)
  7. Traceability of Measurement
  8. Sampling
  9. Handling Test and Calibration Items
  10. Assuring the Quality of Test and Calibration Results

14 Requirements specific to Food testing laboratories – Biological parameters

  1. Introduction
  2. Quality and Safety Requirements of Food Products
  3. Biological Testing Requirements of Food Products

15 General topics- related to Food testing laboratories

  1. Method Validation
  2. Ruggedness
  3. Uncertainty of Measurement
  4. International Accreditation Aspects

16 BRC Food and BRC/IOP Standards – An Overview

  1. BRC Global Standard – Food (Issue 5, January 2005)
  2. Introduction to BRC Food Standard
  3. Legislative Requirements
  4. Benefits of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  5. Principles of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  6. The Standard Technical Advisory Committee
  7. Scope of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  8. The Format of the BRC Global Standard – Food
  9. Application
  10. Structure and Interpretation of the Standard
  11. BRC / IOP Global Standard Issue 3 2001 (Food Packaging and Other Packaging Materials)
  12. IOP: The Institute of Packaging
  13. BRC/IOP Relationship
  14. Benefits of BRC/IOP Packaging Standard
  15. Principles of BRC/IOP Packaging Standard
  16. Application
  17. Structure of BRC / IOP Global Standard – Food Packaging and Other Packaging Materials

17 International Food Standard

  1. Background of the IFS
  2. Service Protocol of the IFS ISSUE 5
  3. Contractual Arrangements – Selection of Certifying Body
  4. Audit Notification
  5. Scope of the Audit
  6. Audit Flow – Preparing the Audit Plan
  7. Level Determination – KO, Major NC’s, NA
  8. Scores, Issuing the Audit Report and Certification
  9. Audit Frequency
  10. Audit Report
  11. Awarding of Certificate
  12. Distribution of the Audit Report
  13. Supplementary Action
  14. Appeal Procedure
  15. Complaints
  16. IFS – Catalogue of Requirements
  17. Management of Quality System
  18. Management Responsibility
  19. Resource Management
  20. Product Realization
  21. Measurements, Analysis and Improvements
  22. Requirements for Certification Bodies and Auditors
  23. Report

18 SQF 1000 And SQF 2000

  1. SQF 1000
  2. Interpretation of SQF 1000 Standard
  3. SQF 2000
  4. Interpretation of SQF 2000 Standard
  5. Let Us Sum Up

19 Global GAP and India GAP

  1. Potential Benefits and Challenges Related to Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)
  2. Description of the FAO/GAPs
  3. USDA GAP/GHP Programme
  4. Global GAP
  5. India GAP